Search
Now showing results 1-10 of 25
What It Means to be a Digital County
(1/1/2018)
Results from 2018 GovTech Survey on Digital Counties, i.e. CIO priorities, emerging tech, and means of engagement at the local level
Cloud IT Service Management System Saves Utah Millions
(2018)
Cloud-based IT service management system, including a new asset management function, saves state millions of dollars, boosts department revenues and keeps technology running for thousands of state workers.
COVITS 2019
(2019-09-04)
Government Technology's passion is helping spread best practices and spurring innovation in the public sector. COVITS is designed to do just that. The summit has an advisory board that gathers public sector and private ...
NASCIO Releases Top CIO Priorities for 2019
(2018-12-06)
The report breaks down where state IT leaders will be focusing their attention in the coming year.
Cybersecurity in 2019: A Time for Bigger Budgets and More Talent
(2019-02-08)
Just as thriving communities need well-equipped and expertly trained police and fire departments, state and local governments require the best in cybersecurity.
California Launches 'Cal eProcure' Online Procurement System
(2015-12-10)
This article provides an overview of the California e-procure system.
Idaho Rejects Bill on Local IT Contracts
(2019-03-06)
A proposed bill to no longer require local governments to publish IT bids in local newspapers has been rejected by the Senate Local Government and Taxation Committee.
Colorado's Technology Office to Hire 'Blockchain Architect'
(2019-03-25)
The Colorado Governor's Office of Information Technology will soon name its first "Blockchain and Distributed Ledger (BDL) Solution Architect," the state's chief technology officer announced.
North Dakota Adopts Statewide Cybersecurity Approach
(2019-04-12)
A newly signed law gives the Information Technology Department the authority to define cybersecurity for all public entities within the state.
Massachusetts Proposes Restriction on Facial Recognition
(2019-02-11)
Proposition would make it illegal for state entities to "acquire, possess, access, or use any biometric surveillance system."